Chapter 5
Irresistible
Growth Beckons
Dreams come true;
without that possibility, nature would not incite us to have them.
— John Updike
Doubling Up
No one in his right mind would sit down
to write a book
if he were a well-adjusted, happy man.
— Jay McInerney
Peter Drucker knew a glutton for punishment when he saw one.
Like a mother who doesn’t remember the pain of childbirth, I soon found that I
missed not writing every day. Over my career, I’d written more than my share of
articles, workbooks, and research papers. The writing always seemed so
rewarding to me that I really didn’t care if anyone read the work. Even writing
The 2,000 Percent Solution (which had
become painful at the end) became a happy memory in the rosy glow of
postpublication applause.
Needing no more encouragement
than the itch to write again, I immediately began working on a new book
proposal. At least I had learned one lesson from The 2,000 Percent Solution: Don’t write the book before you have a
publisher unless you plan to self-publish. Having been featured as one of the
top two new books in our publisher’s large catalogue, naturally I expected they
would be quick to grab a new book from us. Unfortunately, experience had taught
our publisher that a sequel sells a lot less than the original book; they would
be content to wait to see how well the first book sold before considering a
second work. There was no rush.
However, that’s not how I felt. I
had all these important ideas I wanted to write about. I began shopping my
proposal around to other business book publishers. These clever businesspeople
also wanted to see how the first book did before making a commitment. Many of
them candidly told me that if my first publisher didn’t want a second book,
they didn’t want to take a chance either.
Fortunately, not everyone felt
that way. We found a bright young publisher who had specialized in reprinting English
books in the United States
that had been originally published elsewhere. He wanted to launch a line of
original titles and thought it was a great idea to have two of the coauthors of
The 2,000 Percent Solution as his
first writers. We liked him and he liked us. We were off to a great start!
Peter Drucker, however, scolded
me rather severely: It was madness for us to write major books more often than
every five years. Peter said he would never do that because all you do is steal
sales from the last book. Books like The
2,000 Percent Solution, he warned us, could take as long as two or three
decades to be understood and appreciated. After all, Herman Melville sold fewer
than a hundred copies of the classic novel, Moby
Dick, during his lifetime.
I politely disagreed. I thought
that a second book coming out sooner would deepen interest in The 2,000 Percent Solution by
demonstrating the practical value of the problem-solving processes it contained.
Well, I was 100 percent wrong in that conclusion.
Filling Mental Gaps
One thorn of experience is worth a whole
wilderness of warning.
— James Russell Lowell
From the book tour, I learned that finding more ways to help
people realize that they already knew about better solutions was going to be
critical to the 400 Year Project. By writing another book that outlined more
examples of stalls, stallbusting, and creating 2,000 percent solutions, I hoped
to trigger more awareness of previously observed near-perfect human performances
that could be emulated in new solutions.
What should the book’s topic be?
I had been struck during my first projects at the Boston Consulting Group by
the way that clients were so very impressed when a strategic solution would
take advantage of positive trends. Subsequently, I noticed how hard most people
tried to get in step with whatever the latest trends were, unless poverty or
infirmity made such adjustments impossible.
One source of that preference for
aligning with trends was the increasing sense that leaders had less and less
influence over their results. It’s hard enough to keep balls in the air as you
juggle them. Add strong winds, a powerful earthquake, and loud noise while
standing on a tightrope, and juggling becomes much harder. The traditional
response to stronger external influences had been to expect more of leaders:
They needed to become ever more agile so that they could quickly twitch
themselves and their organizations into favorable orientations with whatever
shifts affected their business. The description of a good leader increasingly
sounded like that of Superman: “faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful
than a locomotive, and able to leap tall buildings in a single bound.” I didn’t
know any leaders who bore even the slightest resemblance to Superman. What
could a mere mortal leader do instead?
I began reading broadly on the
subject of how leaders can orient organizations to trends. My eye was caught by
a book written by Arie de Geus, The
Living Company (Harvard Business School Press, 1997), that argued
persuasively for using biological metaphors for companies rather than inanimate
ones. My thinking was further sparked by something he said during a talk about
his book at a forum of strategic thinkers: When people have no experience in an
area, they draw a blank when they try to think about what to do. Fill in that
blank with useful experience, and they will make rapid progress. Arie noted
that working on simulated problems based on scenarios describing a challenging
situation was very good for providing relevant experience. This observation was
based on Arie’s work at Shell. He had been involved with the famous scenario-based
planning in which Shell executives had considered what they might do about an
Arab oil embargo before the real thing occurred in the 1970s. Reports suggested
that this scenario thinking had helped Shell to adjust more rapidly and
effectively than many of its competitors.
Arie kindly agreed to spend a day
with Carol and me at his club in London
where we grilled him about the management implications of biological metaphors
and developing advance experience through scenarios. He informed us that
scenario thinking had an unexpected benefit that everyone should pursue: Think
about enough scenarios and you begin to see strategies and tactics that will
leave you better off regardless of what comes next.
We had previously been focused on
finding opportunities that provide upside potential while having little, if
any, downside risk. Our most successful clients instinctively looked at
opportunities that way. In addition, we had fine-tuned our financial strategy
services by helping clients to find actions that had little downside risk,
regardless of what came next in the financial markets.
In The 2,000 Percent Solution, we argued in favor of using simulations
to make people more effective in dealing with surprise situations. But scenario
planning (although it was an area in which we had been active) was not
addressed in that book. Carol and I became intrigued with the opportunity to
focus our new book on more ways to create mental bridges that allow people to
effectively deal with issues outside of their direct control.
The Joys of Cellular Slime Molds
The power of a movement lies in the fact
that it can indeed change the habits of people.
— Steve Biko
Carol and I take great pleasure in finding natural
circumstances that seem to defy expectations. In The 2,000 Percent Solution, we pointed out that lizards in the Bahamas
were able to physically adapt to their hostile environments more than 2,000
times faster than evolutionary biologists predicted. That discovery was an unexpected
finding from an experiment to study extinction. The lizards were placed on
islands where they were supposed to rapidly die out because the environments
were too hostile for them to survive. But instead, the lizards had thrived in
their new homes in various ways on 14 different islands with unique
environments by changing physically and learning new behaviors that perfectly
fit each island. We loved that example because people should be even more
adaptable than lizards by drawing on resources such as ideas from others,
helping each other, and using various kinds of work and thinking tools.
Arie urged us to find a
biological metaphor for our new book. We searched around and discovered the
amazing survival abilities of cellular slime molds. Forgive us for our passion
about something you’ve probably never heard of before. I think you’ll be
intrigued by what we learned. If you want more details, check out the article
by John Tyler Bonner in the December 1984 issue of Science ’84.
Cellular slime molds (a type of
amoeba) live individually on the forest floor. The available food supply limits
their growth and prosperity, as it does for all amoebas. When the food is gone,
stationary amoebas die out. But unlike stationary amoebas, cellular slime molds
act in a most unusual way when food is scarce: The cellular slime mold amoebas clump
themselves into a community that oozes along as slime until it reaches a spot
where more food is present.
They have another trick for
finding new homes as well. Clumps of the amoebas will undergo additional
physical changes, creating a multicelled stalk holding a sac filled with
dormant spores. When animals or people brush against the sacs, the spores
attach themselves and are carried to new locations beyond the range that the
clump could move on its own.
As a result of these physical
adaptations, it doesn’t matter where the amoebas start out because they are
designed to move themselves and their descendents to a better place. In
essence, cellular slime molds are designed for adjusting to rapidly varying
conditions … much as early humans did by roving in hunting bands to where the
game was.
Don Quixote, Please Don’t Tilt at the Windmills!
The wind of change is blowing through
the continent.
— Harold Macmillan
Being concerned that our readers wouldn’t be as inspired by
cellular slime molds as we were, we decided to also use a physical metaphor for
the new book that would seem a little more familiar: wind. Wind has often been
invoked as a metaphor for change. Having grown up in an area known for its Santa Ana winds, I was
well aware of how the wind affects our moods and our daily tasks. Face into a
howling desert wind and your eyes are soon filled with grit. At night, the same
force drives cold drafts of air through the house and makes being indoors
unpleasant. The sound of that force makes sleeping difficult. The trash that
piles up in your yard from the wind clearly represents undesirable change. However,
when you run a race with the wind at your back, you feel jet propelled. When the
wind tapers off, everyone has a sense of new opportunities and optimism. In our
book, we would use wind to represent all of the irresistible forces outside of
our control that have powerful impacts on us and our organizations.
What are some of those forces?
You should make your own list, but the most common irresistible forces
described to us by CEOs are new technology, changing customer needs, fashion, government
regulation, demographics, economic trends, financial markets, the weather, and
currency exchange rates.
The wind was also one of
mankind’s earliest sources of power for travel. Where winds were common, simple
sails filled with the breeze pushed primitive vessels forward when the wind
came from the right direction. Otherwise, oars were used for much slower progress.
Later, shipbuilders learned to make adjustable sails and gear that would
capture the wind’s power from any direction other than straight ahead. By
shifting course to go in a zig-zag style, progress could be made even into a
head wind.
On land, windmills were
eventually employed for other kinds of work, from pumping water out of
low-lying areas (as in Holland)
to powering electrical generation in windy deserts. The biggest windmills originally
had a serious drawback: Like the earliest sails, they only faced in one
direction. If the wind came from another direction, little or no benefit was gained.
Like the clever shipbuilders before them, windmill makers learned to adjust:
They made propeller blades with vanes behind them that automatically pivot to
optimally face the wind and generate power whenever there is wind. Carol and I
came to see those adjustable windmills as a metaphor for the kind of strategy
and actions that individuals and organizations should take: Use an optimal
strategy or action, and the irresistible forces are always creating power for
you that allow more to be accomplished.
Our choice of adjustable
windmills as a metaphor was inspired in part by one of our favorite clients who
collected little statues of Don Quixote. This man was always trying to set the
world standard in his industry and realized that such high goals could amount
to being overly optimistic. At times during the early days of the 400 Year Project,
we had wondered if we, too, were acting like Don Quixote in some of his more
comic moments such as when he tilted at windmills.
Use the Force, Luke!
May the Force be with you.
— George Lucas
Creating a human equivalent of a pivoting windmill can seem
vastly more difficult and expensive than what is actually required. What’s the
basis of that misperception? Most people have never worked on the task and are
sensitive to how hard it is to change any aspect of what an organization does.
They incorrectly assume that all aspects of the organization need to be incredibly
adaptable — a very difficult and expensive challenge. Contrary to that incorrect
view, an organization with the equivalent of a weather vane pointing it in the
right direction (the proper strategy) will need to adapt very little.
This common misperception taught
us there must be stalls that make it especially difficult to take advantage of
irresistible forces. As with The 2,000
Percent Solution, Carol and I set out to locate those stalls. Here is what
we found: Progress in optimally using irresistible forces is delayed by ignoring
or fighting the irresistible forces. Stalls include
• being directionless to begin
with so that pushes from irresistible forces are viewed with disinterest;
• employing wishful thinking
about being able to accurately predict the future;
• experiencing mental paralysis
when irresistible forces turn unexpectedly adverse;
• deciding to fight irresistible
forces rather than adjust to gain benefit from them;
• choosing to be too independent
in addressing new issues raised by irresistible forces;
• taking an overly optimistic
view of the benefits of following the current direction;
• trying to keep secret the bad
news of being harmed by irresistible forces; and
• underestimating the ability to
handle volatile irresistible forces.
In our new book, we once again provided stallbusters and
stall erasers to handle these stalls.
We also developed a parallel new
eight-step process for taking advantage of irresistible forces:
1. Recognize how measurements can
help your company identify and understand more about irresistible forces.
2. Use your own leading
indicators to anticipate shifts in irresistible forces.
3. Identify future best practices
for locating, anticipating, and adapting to changes in irresistible forces.
4. Extend your vision to identify
best practices beyond anyone else in the future for locating, anticipating, and
adapting to changes in irresistible forces.
5. Identify the ideal best
practice for benefiting from changes in irresistible forces.
6. Determine how your
organization should approach ideal best practices for benefiting from changes
in irresistible forces.
7. Enhance your peoples’ ability
to achieve the benefits of irresistible force management.
8. Repeat steps one through seven
for improved effectiveness in using irresistible force management.
Fleshing out these ideas into a
book format proved to be a lot of fun. We once again were blessed with original
art produced by Tobi Kahn. Following the advice of our staff, we created a Web
site that you can visit by registering at http://www.irresistibleforces.com where
you will find book excerpts and some of the artwork. I also encourage you to
read and apply the book, The Irresistible
Growth Enterprise (Stylus, 2000), in order to develop expertise in this
important activity.
The Sound of Silence
The most important thing in
communication is to hear what isn’t being said.
— Peter F. Drucker
With the experience of promoting The 2,000 Percent Solution behind us, I felt confident that The Irresistible Growth Enterprise could
be launched with a smaller, more focused effort. I was boldly assuming that the
bulk of those who had read and liked The
2,000 Percent Solution would be hungry for more. I must have forgotten
Peter Drucker’s point about few people reading business books. If hardly anyone
had read The 2,000 Percent Solution, just
getting all those people to read the next book wasn’t going to generate a lot
of sales. The rest of the sales would, in fact, have to come from people who
were fascinated by the new book’s title or concept.
From the time that the book was
conceived, we began to speak about irresistible force management just as often
as we did 2,000 percent solutions. But a funny thing happened when we did: The
audience for 2,000 percent solutions would be ten times larger than for
irresistible forces. As you can imagine, that reaction didn’t bode well for
book sales from those newly exposed to this work.
The ratings we got from those who
heard both messages were similarly high. Unfortunately, we had picked a subject
that wasn’t as appealing as creating 2,000 percent solutions. We were up
against the irresistible force of executive indifference. What was the lesson
for your intrepid irresistible force authors? Use your new irresistible force management
process to pick future book topics.
Knowing how fruitless it is to do
local publicity for a book that’s not in distribution, we decided to focus on
markets where we got strong distribution. Unfortunately, that was nowhere other
than our offices and our publisher’s warehouse. Favorable reviews didn’t
exactly pour in either.
Speaking with Peter Drucker about
the modest interest in the book, he was full of explanations. In addition to
not following his advice about waiting until the market further developed for The 2,000 Percent Solution, we had
written a very sophisticated book that would not appeal to everyone. In fact,
Peter confidently reported that it might take 50 years before The Irresistible Growth Enterprise would
be fully appreciated by readers and applied broadly.
His advice: Don’t write any more
books for a while and focus on making our best ideas simpler and easier to
understand rather than developing more sophisticated methods and ideas. Now I followed
his advice.
Focus on Growing the Application
I always avoid prophesying before hand,
because it is a much better policy to
prophesy after the event has taken place.
— Winston Churchill
Peter also assured us we would advance the 400 Year Project
faster than by writing more books if we worked with and observed people who
were applying our ideas from the two books. He also recommended that we focus
our writing on shorter pieces.
Severely chastened, I began to embed
more and more of the 2,000 percent solution and irresistible force management processes
into our consulting assignments. I did, however, reserve some time during my
vacation in 2000 to write brief outlines of new management processes.
If you are interested in taking a
look at these other processes, you’ll find them at http://www.mitchellandco.com/mngmnt.html.
You can read about subjects such as innovation leadership, future management,
capital management, mutual benefit management, error-proof management, and
leading one-person organizations. That Web site’s management section has an
unusual structure designed to make the materials easier to select from and to
use. Each subject opens with a brief summary to help you decide if the material
is relevant to your needs. If you find that you are interested, you go to a
prediagnostic page that tells you how to determine the potential of the subject
to help you. If that exercise is sufficiently positive, you go on to a set of
instructions for employing the process that include an example and a
description of likely benefits. After you apply those instructions, you can click
through to the postdiagnostic page that tells you how to build on your first
successes in applying the process.
For awhile I was tempted to crank
out dozens of these processes. Then I realized that Peter would have advised me
to get the processes I had into circulation before adding any more.
My tracking study of CEO best
practices for Chief Executive Magazine
provided me with an opportunity to write about the two books and these
processes. For example, the June 2000 issue of Chief Executive Magazine carried my thoughts on “Irresistible Force
Management.” You can find that article at http://www.mitchellandco.com/leadership.html
by clicking on the index for 2000 that you’ll find at that Web address.
Copyright © 2007. 2012 by Donald
Mitchell.
No comments:
Post a Comment